FOOD
CROPS. Biological
ways to increase yield and improve the soil. Chapter
11 in the book CIAT / Reinhardt Howeler 2014. Publication No. 389; Reference manual: Sustainable Soil and Crops Management of Cassava in Asia
280 p.
(Summary
for Chapter 11)
In many parts of the world, crops are still grown without application of chemical fertilizers, either because they are not available or they are considered too costly. In that case, farmers often try to maintain soil fertility through various biological means, including shifting cultivation, agro-forestry, crop rotation, green manuring, mulching, cover cropping, alley cropping, and intercropping, as well as the application of animal manures or compost. In general, these methods are most suitable in areas where labor is available and cheap, and where purchased inputs like fertilizers are unavailable or expensive, particularly in extensive agriculture systems. They can also be used to supplement the application of chemical fertilizers, mainly to increase the organic matter content of the soil, which will improve soil structure, bulk density, soil aggregate stability, water- and nutrient-holding capacity, and drainage.
In many parts of the world, crops are still grown without application of chemical fertilizers, either because they are not available or they are considered too costly. In that case, farmers often try to maintain soil fertility through various biological means, including shifting cultivation, agro-forestry, crop rotation, green manuring, mulching, cover cropping, alley cropping, and intercropping, as well as the application of animal manures or compost. In general, these methods are most suitable in areas where labor is available and cheap, and where purchased inputs like fertilizers are unavailable or expensive, particularly in extensive agriculture systems. They can also be used to supplement the application of chemical fertilizers, mainly to increase the organic matter content of the soil, which will improve soil structure, bulk density, soil aggregate stability, water- and nutrient-holding capacity, and drainage.
It can be concluded that cassava is a very weak competitor and suffers
serious setbacks if it has to compete with weeds, intercrops, or cover crops,
especially at the early stage of establishment, due to its slow initial rate of
growth.
Specific observations and recommendations on how to increase cassava
yields and improve soil fertility through biological means can be summarized as
follows:
Intercropping.
From these various intercropping experiments we can conclude that, when
well-managed, intercropping with short-duration food crops will generally
result in reduced soil loss by erosion due to more rapid canopy development. Incorporation
of the intercrop residues will tend to increase soil organic matter and, if the
intercrop is a legume, may contribute more N fixed from the air. But to maintain high yield of both cassava
and the intercrops, both crops should be adequately fertilized.
Applying commercial fertilizers in
combination with animal manures or compost. For that reason, it is
recommended to apply commercial fertilizers in combination with animal manures
or compost; and, if diseases and pests are not a major problem, to incorporate
back into the soil all the cassava crop residues in order to return organic matter and plant nutrients.
Alley cropping. Among biological
solutions mentioned above, alley cropping between leguminous hedgerow species seems
to have the greatest long-term beneficial effect on cassava yields and soil
fertility. Once established, the hedgerows require little maintenance besides
regular pruning and they can survive for at least 15–20 years without the need
for replanting. Besides improving soil fertility, the prunings, when mulched on
the soil surface, will help to control weeds and erosion, reduce soil surface
temperatures, and increase soil moisture.
Cover crops: Most perennial cover crops will strongly compete
with cassava at the early stages of growth, resulting in low cassava yields.
Most intercropped green manures or long-duration intercrops will also tend to
reduce cassava yields;
Green manures. Most beneficial are some of the
green manures when they are grown and incorporated before planting cassava, but
only in areas with a long wet season that provides sufficient soil moisture
during most of the cassava growth cycle.
Mulching. Similar beneficial effects of mulching have
also been obtained when native weeds were cut and mulched before planting
cassava with minimum tillage.
Shifting
cultivation. In the past, shifting
cultivation was practiced when land was plentiful and no other alternatives
existed for restoring fertility after several cropping cycles. However, in most
countries land is now scarce and not enough land is available for the long
fallow periods necessary to maintain soil fertility;
The keys biological solutions. If no chemical fertilizers are
available or are too costly, soil fertility can at least be partially restored
by some of the biological solutions discussed in this chapter.
CHAPTER 11
...
Shifting
cultivation
In
many areas in the tropics, farmers try to maintain soil fertility through
shifting cultivation, also known as “slash-and-burn” systems. After several
years of cropping, the land is left to return to bush fallow or forest for 10–20
years, to let the soil rest and replenish nutrients lost during the cropping
cycle. However, because of rapid population growth and the consequent increase
in land pressure, the fallow period has steadily been shortened while the
cropping cycle and intensity have increased.
Research
conducted on very poor and degraded soils in southern Colombia indicates that
even long periods of bush fallow were not able to fully restore soil fertility,
and cassava yields remained below 8–10 t/ha. By contrast, with the application
of N, P, and K in chemical fertilizers, cassava yields doubled or tripled,
reaching over 24 t/ha in the third consecutive planting. In this and many
similar situations, farmers could greatly increase their income if they would
grow cassava on a more permanent basis on the best and flattest land using
commercial fertilizers, while leaving the steeper and more degraded fields in
permanent pasture or planting coffee, fruit trees, or forest.
In addition, when slash-and-burn
systems are practiced on steep slopes, such as in Lao PDR, and parts of western
Vietnam, after burning of the forest during the dry season, much of the
resulting ash is washed down-slope with the first rains of the wet season
before crops can be planted, making the system ineffective in replenishing soil
fertility. The result is a steady decline in soil fertility, an increase in
soil erosion, and decreasing crop yields.
Alley
cropping
This is a type of agro-forestry
in which crops and trees are combined in the same field with the objective of
improving the nutrition of the crops, and in some cases to reduce erosion. Crops are planted in the alleys between rows
of fast-growing leguminous trees. The space between hedgerows can be
varied, but is usually around 4–5 meters, so that less than 20% of the total
land area is occupied by the hedgerows.
The trees are cut back at least once a year to about 50 cm above the ground and the prunings are either incorporated into the soil of the alleys before the crop is planted, or mulched on the soil surface to supply nutrients and to control weeds and soil erosion.
The benefit of leguminous trees is that they can fix considerable amounts of N, which is added to the soil in the alleys through the decomposing prunings. In addition, the trees are deep rooted and are able to take up nutrients from deeper soil layers and recycle them to the top soil, where they become available to the crops.
Also, because the trees are deep rooted they compete less for water and nutrients than fast growing intercrops. The trees will need to be pruned regularly, but do not require replanting for many years, and therefore do not require the annual purchase of seed.
The trees are cut back at least once a year to about 50 cm above the ground and the prunings are either incorporated into the soil of the alleys before the crop is planted, or mulched on the soil surface to supply nutrients and to control weeds and soil erosion.
The benefit of leguminous trees is that they can fix considerable amounts of N, which is added to the soil in the alleys through the decomposing prunings. In addition, the trees are deep rooted and are able to take up nutrients from deeper soil layers and recycle them to the top soil, where they become available to the crops.
Also, because the trees are deep rooted they compete less for water and nutrients than fast growing intercrops. The trees will need to be pruned regularly, but do not require replanting for many years, and therefore do not require the annual purchase of seed.
The results of several alley-cropping experiments
can be summarized as follows:
·
Best
results have been obtained with the leguminous shrub or tree species of Leucaena leucocephala, Gliricidia sepium and Flemingia macrophylla.
·
The trees are planted in rows about
4–6 meters apart and several rows of cassava are planted in the space (alleys)
between the rows of trees.
·
The trees need to be cut back to
about 50 cm above the ground at least once a year, before planting cassava, and
the prunings are incorporated into the soil of the alleys before planting
cassava, or are spread as a mulch on top of the soil.
·
Cassava yields may or may not
increase for the first few years of cropping as the trees take time to
establish. But after a few years, cassava yields will increase, soil loss by
erosion will decrease, and soil fertility will markedly improve.
·
Mulching or incorporating the tree
prunings will increase the organic matter content of the soil and improve the
soil’s chemical and physical characteristics.
·
The
three tree species mentioned above will not need to be replanted for many
years, but the leguminous shrub, Tephrosia
candida, will need to be replanted every 3–4 years
Cover cropping
Cover crops are usually perennial
forage legumes planted to fix N and recycle soil nutrients to improve soil
fertility, and to prevent serious soil erosion on sloping land. Annual crops
may be planted in individual planting holes or in strips where the cover crop
has been incorporated into the soil or killed with herbicides.
Several cover-cropping experiments, conducted in Colombia and Thailand, show that cassava is a weak competitor and that yields are reduced markedly if plants have to compete with deep-rooted and well-established forage legumes used as cover crops. This competition is particularly strong during cassava plant establishment, especially when this coincides with a period of drought. Thus, cover cropping with most forage legumes is not practical since it tends to reduce cassava yields and requires considerable additional labor.
Several cover-cropping experiments, conducted in Colombia and Thailand, show that cassava is a weak competitor and that yields are reduced markedly if plants have to compete with deep-rooted and well-established forage legumes used as cover crops. This competition is particularly strong during cassava plant establishment, especially when this coincides with a period of drought. Thus, cover cropping with most forage legumes is not practical since it tends to reduce cassava yields and requires considerable additional labor.
Green
manuring
This usually refers to the
practice of growing a grain or forage legume on the land for several months
prior to planting the main crop. The green manures are generally cut
after 2–3 months of growth and are either incorporated into the soil or mulched
on top of the soil before planting the main crop. This will improve the soil’s
fertility, especially that of N, due to N fixation by the legumes.
However, green manures can also be planted as an intercrop within the main crop
and slashed back and mulched after 2–3 months of growth; or they can be planted
as narrow strips alternating with strips of the main crop.
Many green manure species have
been tested to see their effect on the following cassava crop. In a highly acid
soil in Colombia, green manures were incorporated into the soil before planting
cassava. From this experiment, it can be concluded that cassava
yields increased most by the application of fertilizers, but incorporation of
green manures also helped to increase yields, especially when no fertilizers
were applied to cassava. Peanut
was among the most effective species, but Zornia
latifolia, Pueraria phaseoloides and Centrosema pubescens were also very
effective, especially in the presence of fertilizers.
Other experiments, conducted on
sandy and highly infertile soil on the north coast of Colombia, suggest that
among green manures tested, the mulching of Canavalia
ensiformis and native weeds were most effective, while Crotalaria juncea was least productive and least effective in
increasing cassava yields.
In
India, the standard recommendation for cassava is to apply 100 kg N, 50 kg P2O5
and 100 kg K2O/ha as chemical fertilizer, together with 12.5 t/ha of
farmyard manure (FYM). Since FYM is
expensive and cumbersome to transport and apply, a long-term experiment was
conducted from 1990 to 2004 to determine whether green manuring with vegetable
cowpea could reduce the need for FYM and/or reduce the high levels of chemical
fertilizer input.
Vegetable cowpea was planted during pre-monsoon rains in February and after the harvest of green pods, the total crop biomass was incorporated into the soil before planting cassava in May. The effect of incorporating the crop residues of cassava back into the soil after harvest was also investigated. The results indicate that by practicing green manuring with cowpea biomass, the application of FYM as well as that of N and P could be reduced to only 50% of the previously recommended rates. Also, the annual incorporation of cassava crop residues could completely replace the application of 12.5 t/ha of FYM as long as the recommended rates of N, P, and K were applied.
Vegetable cowpea was planted during pre-monsoon rains in February and after the harvest of green pods, the total crop biomass was incorporated into the soil before planting cassava in May. The effect of incorporating the crop residues of cassava back into the soil after harvest was also investigated. The results indicate that by practicing green manuring with cowpea biomass, the application of FYM as well as that of N and P could be reduced to only 50% of the previously recommended rates. Also, the annual incorporation of cassava crop residues could completely replace the application of 12.5 t/ha of FYM as long as the recommended rates of N, P, and K were applied.
Many
green manure experiments have been conducted in Thailand to determine the most
effective green manure species and their management for the local climatic and
soil conditions. In the cassava-growing areas of Thailand, total annual
rainfall is about 1,200 mm, with the rainy season starting in about May and
terminating in October.
In one experiment, conducted for
five years, three green manures were planted in the very early part of the
rainy season and their biomass incorporated into the soil after 60 days of
growth, after which cassava was planted and then harvested after 10 months. It
was found that cowpea was more effective than Crotalaria juncea in increasing cassava yields, while pigeon pea
had little beneficial effect. Cowpea produced more biomass, and thus had a
higher nutrient content. In addition, it improved the physical conditions of
the soil, such as bulk density and water infiltration rates.
Other
experiments conducted in Pluak Daeng, Thailand, concluded that, among the green
manures tested, Crotalaria juncea was
the most productive and the most effective in increasing cassava yield; that
incorporation of the green manures resulted in slightly higher cassava yields
than mulching; and that some green manures were as effective as – or even more
effective than – chemical fertilizer in increasing cassava yield. However,
under the climatic conditions of Thailand, which has a 6-month dry season, the
traditional use of green manures is impractical, since the better part of the
relatively short rainy season is used for the production of green manures,
while the following cassava crop produces low yield due to drought stress in
the dry season. For that reason, green manuring is seldom adopted by Thai
cassava farmers.
Another
alternative is to plant the green manures in the early part of the rainy
season, cut them back and mulch the biomass after 3–4 months; then plant
cassava without further land preparation and leave the crop for 18 to 21
months. This can double cassava yields and reduce production costs as the land
needs to be prepared only once every 2 years, and weeding and harvesting costs
are also reduced.
From
these various green manure experiments the following may be concluded:
·
Planting green manures can increase
cassava yields in areas with a relatively long wet season or with two short
rainy seasons per year, especially when no fertilizers are applied
·
In areas with a single and
relatively short wet season, planting green manures may seriously reduce
cassava yields. This is because planting green manures in the early part of the
rainy season markedly reduces the time that the following cassava crop can
benefit from adequate rains ˗ unless cassava is left in the ground during the entire
following wet season and is harvested only after18 months.
·
Intercropping with green manures at
the time of cassava planting and cutting back the green manure at 2–3 months
after planting (MAP) can result in low cassava yield due to excessive
competition of the green manure with cassava.
·
Interplanting the green manures
within a mature cassava stand at 7–8 MAP and incorporating the green manure just
before the next cassava planting may increase the yield of the following
cassava crop
Although
green manuring may have short-term benefits for crop productivity, the
long-term effects on soil fertility are not very clear. Whenever labor is
scarce, farmers will probably prefer to maximize their yields through the use
of commercial fertilizers.
Mulching
Mulching,
that is, leaving the crop residues or other biomass on top of the soil, or
bringing in such biomass from other locations, has the advantage that the mulch
will reduce weed growth, preserve soil moisture, and reduce temperature
fluctuations, while it also protects the soil from the direct impact of
raindrops resulting in less erosion. Mulching biomass also eliminates the need
for additional work incorporating the biomass into the soil. If the soil is
loose the cassava stakes can be planted directly through the mulch into the
soil. This method of minimum or zero tillage improves the organic matter and
structure of the soil.
Results
from a mulching experiment in Colombia indicate that application of large
amounts (12 t/ha) of dry mulch of guinea grass (Panicum maximum) supplied the cassava plants with K, Ca, Mg, and N
nutrients; helped maintain soil moisture;
and reduced the temperature of the surface soil. This resulted in increased
cassava root and top biomass, increased root dry matter content while reducing
its yearly variation, and decreased the cyanogenic potential of the roots, particularly
in the absence of fertilizers. Over the years, both the application of mulch
and that of fertilizers increased the soil P and K levels, while without mulch,
the soil’s acidity increased. However, the application of such large amounts of
mulch may be very labor intensive, depending on the distance between the
cassava field and the source of mulch.
Crop rotation
In
most countries in Asia, cassava is grown on the same fields year after year.
Especially in areas with heavy soils and poor internal drainage, where root
rots are frequently observed, farmers are advised to rotate cassava with other
crops, especially cereals and grasses, in order to reduce the soil inoculum of
the main causal agent, Phytophthora
spp. With the recent appearance of witches’-broom disease, mainly in Vietnam,
Thailand, and Cambodia, it is advisable to rotate cassava with other crops to
prevent the spread of the disease through infected crop residues left from the
previous cassava crop.
Crop
rotations also can increase farmers’ income. Short-duration varieties can produce
a reasonably high yield when harvested after 7–8 months, leaving enough time
for another short-duration crop to be grown during the same year.
In
Kerala state of India, cassava is now often grown in lowland areas where
short-duration cassava varieties are planted after the harvest of a
short-duration rice crop. Under those conditions, yields of cassava are
substantially higher than in the traditional upland areas. Even higher incomes can be obtained when
cassava follows a crop of vegetable cowpea, or when a peanut crop follows
cassava under lowland rice field conditions. However, growing cassava after a
rice crop in lowland areas requires a lot of labor to build raised beds to grow
the cassava without waterlogging. High cassava yields are obtained because of
the higher fertility of the lowland soils as well as the higher water retention
capacity of these soils during the dry season.
Researchers
in Thailand have shown that rotating cassava with well-adapted grain legumes,
such as peanut and pigeon pea, has long-term advantages over continuous cassava
production; however, the latter is still the common practice among farmers in
northeast Thailand.
Intercropping
Crops
grown in association tend to cause less loss of nutrients through erosion and
leaching but more loss of nutrients removed in the harvested products.
Intercropping represents an intensification of the demand for nutrients,
particularly when each associated crop is planted at its normal density. In
this case, the removal of nutrients from the soil is higher than when cassava
is grown in monoculture (Table 1).
Table 1. Removal of soil nutrients by the products
(roots and grains) harvested in a cassava – mungbean intercropping system,
compared to removal by cassava planted in monoculture.
Nutrients removed (kg/ha)
|
||||||
System
|
N
|
P
|
K
|
Ca
|
Mg
|
S
|
Cassava
in monoculture
|
40
|
5
|
78
|
19
|
8
|
6
|
Cassava–mungbean
intercropping
|
90
|
11
|
84
|
18
|
10
|
9
|
A
long-term intercropping experiment conducted in Thailand, showed that after 24
years of intercropping cassava with peanut or soybeans the soil organic matter
content had increased from the original 1.0% to 1.2 or 1.3%, while in plots
with continuous cassava monoculture it had slightly decreased to 0.9%. In another long-term experiment conducted in
South Vietnam, intercropping cassava with peanut and without fertilizer
application, the soil organic matter and available P contents had increased,
but the soil Ca and K contents had decreased, probably due to the greater
nutrient removal by the harvest of both cassava and the intercropped peanut.
From these
various intercropping experiments we can conclude that, when well-managed,
intercropping with short-duration food crops will generally result in reduced
soil loss by erosion due to more rapid canopy development. Incorporation of the
intercrop residues will tend to increase soil organic matter and, if the
intercrop is a legume, may contribute more N fixed from the air. But to maintain high yield of both cassava
and the intercrops, both crops should be adequately fertilized.
Conclusions
It can be concluded that cassava is a very weak competitor and suffers
serious setbacks if it has to compete with weeds, intercrops, or cover crops,
especially at the early stage of establishment, due to its slow initial rate of
growth.
Specific observations and recommendations on how to increase cassava
yields and improve soil fertility through biological means can be summarized as
follows:
·
Most
perennial cover crops will strongly compete with cassava at the early stages of
growth, resulting in low cassava yields. Most intercropped green manures or
long-duration intercrops will also tend to reduce cassava yields.
·
Most
beneficial are some of the green manures when they are grown and incorporated
before planting cassava, but only in areas with a long wet season that provides
sufficient soil moisture during most of the cassava growth cycle.
·
Among biological solutions mentioned
above, alley cropping between leguminous hedgerow species seems to have the
greatest long-term beneficial effect on cassava yields and soil fertility. Once
established, the hedgerows require little maintenance besides regular pruning
and they can survive for at least 15–20 years without the need for replanting.
Besides improving soil fertility, the prunings, when mulched on the soil surface, will help to control weeds and erosion, reduce soil surface temperatures, and increase soil moisture
Besides improving soil fertility, the prunings, when mulched on the soil surface, will help to control weeds and erosion, reduce soil surface temperatures, and increase soil moisture
·
Similar beneficial effects of
mulching have also been obtained when native weeds were cut and mulched before
planting cassava with minimum tillage.
·
In the past, shifting cultivation
was practiced when land was plentiful and no other alternatives existed for
restoring fertility after several cropping cycles. However, in most countries
land is now scarce and not enough land is available for the long fallow periods
necessary to maintain soil fertility.
·
For that reason, it is recommended
to apply commercial fertilizers in combination with animal manures or compost;
and, if diseases and pests are not a major problem, to incorporate back into
the soil all the cassava crop residues in order to return organic matter and plant nutrients
·
If no chemical fertilizers are
available or are too costly, soil fertility can at least be partially restored
by some of the biological solutions discussed in this chapter.
See more ...
The future of Agriculture: Biologicals and cover crops |
|
||||
|
(*) Source: Sustainable Soil and Crops
Management of Cassava in Asia hoặc tại Biological
ways to increase yield and improve the soil; Cách thức sinh học để tăng năng suất và cải thiện đất; Nông nghiệp bền vững, tiếng Anh cho em.
Bản dịch tiếng Việt:
Quản lý đất và cây trồng bền vững đối với sắn ở châu Á, sách hướng dẫn từ
nghiên cứu đến thực hành. Soạn giả Reinhardt Howeler và Tin Maung Aye. Chủ biên
dịch Hoàng Kim với sự cộng tác của Hoàng Long, Nguyễn Thị Trúc Mai, Nguyễn Bạch
Mai. (xem tiếp CÂY LƯƠNG THỰC. Cách thức sinh học để tăng năng suất và cải thiện đất.)
Video yêu thích
Video yêu thích
Tình ca muôn đời - Phương Thanh
http://www.youtube.com/user/hoangkimvietnam
Trở về trang chính
hoangkim vietnam, hoangkim, hoangkimvietnam, Hoàng Kim, Ngọc Phương Nam, Chào ngày mới Thung dung, Dạy và học, Cây Lương thực, Tin Nông nghiệp Việt Nam, Food Crops, foodcrops.vn, Cassava in Vietnam, VietnamAfricaCassavaRice, Khát khao xanh, Dayvahoc, Học mỗi ngày, Danh nhân Việt , Food Crops News, Điểm chính, CNM365, Câu chuyện ảnh, 5 phút thư giản, Kim LinkedIn, KimTwitter, KimFaceBook Đọc lại và suy ngẫm, Việt Nam tổ quốc tôi, Tình yêu cuộc sống, Thơ cho con
ralph lauren outlet
Trả lờiXóacheap oakley sunglasses
ray ban sunglasses
ugg boots
san diego chargers jerseys
pandora jewelry
jordan 4
prada shoes outlet
san antonio spurs
atlanta falcons jersey